Mining pools: fees, payouts, and what is subtracted between rig and wallet

The rig generates revenue, but less arrives in the wallet — the pool, the network and the exchange each take their cut along the way, each with its own rules. The gap between the "revenue" on mining sites and "what actually arrived" is normally a few percent; over a farm's year it is real money. Here is a breakdown of every deduction and a sane way to compare pools.

The short version (for the no-time-to-read)

  • The pool charges a fee on revenue — typically 1–2%; it is usually printed in small print next to the "0 fee" banner.
  • The payout scheme (PPS vs PPLNS) changes the smoothness of income and the risk of "empty" windows, but not the long-run sum — pick by stability, not "more right now".
  • Minimum payout and withdrawal fees are hidden costs. Withdrawing small balances costs proportionally more: part of the revenue goes into network transfer fees.
  • The pool's uptime is also a cost: while it is unreachable, shares are lost and nothing compensates them.
  • Compare pools by the wallet, not by websites. Two pools with identical fees produce different facts; count from a month of actual deposits.

The coin's journey: who deducts what

The coin passes through four links, and each can lose some:

  1. The pool

    Aggregates the hashrate of thousands of miners, finds blocks and splits their revenue. It takes a fee (usually 1–2%) and sometimes charges for early withdrawals. There are "0%" pools — read their mechanics: a zero fee usually hides other income sources or less favorable schemes.

  2. The coin's network

    Transferring from the wallet costs a network fee; at small withdrawal amounts it becomes a noticeable share of the sum.

  3. The exchange

    Converting the coin to fiat — another fee plus the price spread. Withdrawal speed and limits depend on the venue; compare in advance.

  4. The rig's time

    Downtime is not a line in the bill, but a direct loss of revenue; its price is broken down in our profitability article.

PPLNS vs PPS: the practical difference

Payout schemes define how the pool splits block revenue among miners:

Practical takeaway: a small farm usually finds PPS more comfortable (predictability); over a long horizon the options are comparable — count your own numbers from monthly payouts.

Min-payout and withdrawal fees: the quiet costs

Every pool has a minimum balance for withdrawal. The network fee is roughly the same regardless of the amount — so ten withdrawals of 5 coins cost more than one withdrawal of 50. On small balances, the transfer fee can eat a noticeable share of revenue.

How to compare pools honestly

  1. Count by facts, not by websites

    Stay on two pools for at least a couple of weeks and compare wallet deposits with an identical rig. Identical "paper" fees produce different facts because of schemes and lost blocks.

  2. Compare monitoring comfort too

    Each pool has its own web interface and status pages; the difference between "updates once a minute" and "once an hour" is a real difference in daily experience.

  3. Another factor: uptime and server proximity

    A pool with good uptime and servers near you loses fewer shares — especially relevant on unstable internet.

The bot's part in this

Choosing a pool is your decision; the bot does not make it for you. Its role is not losing what you have already earned: OCBot prevents the rig from silently idling and reports failures in Telegram. And folding every pool deduction into profit is the job of the calculator, with your own tariff and a clean per-card line.